The Genetic Conspiracy — Are Genetically Engineered Foods Dangerous?

How safe is “Genetic Engineering” really? Monsanto, the world’s largest genetic engineering corporation, insists it is safe. But numerous studies have shown that genetically modified plants can cause allergies and cancers. Nonetheless, commercial and political interests are determined to make genetic engineering the norm.

Check out Mercola.com to see how safe “genetic engineering” really is.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Comments

Music a ‘mega-vitamin’ for the brain

When Nina Temple was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 2000, then aged 44, she quickly became depressed, barely venturing out of her house as she struggled to come to terms with living with the chronic condition.

“I was thinking of all the things which I wished I’d done with my life and I wouldn’t be able to do. And then I started thinking about all the things that I still actually could do and singing was one of those,” Temple told CNN.

Along with a fellow Parkinson’s sufferer, Temple decided, on a whim, to form a choir. The pair placed notices in doctor’s surgeries inviting others to join them and advertised for a singing teacher.

By 2003, with the help of funding from the Parkinson’s Disease Society, the resulting ensemble “Sing For Joy” was up and running, rehearsing weekly and soon graduating to public performances.

The group now consists of around two dozen singers, including sufferers of Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis, others recovering from conditions including stroke or cancer, plus their carers, family and friends. Led by acclaimed jazz performer Carol Grimes, the group’s genre-defying repertoire ranges from Cole Porter classics to ethnic punk.

Read More = CNN World News - 2 June 2009

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Oprah Blasted For Supporting Alternative Medicine

In January of this year, Oprah Winfrey invited Suzanne Somers on her show to talk about health tips. The 62-year-old actress uses bio-identical estrogen cream and progesterone on her other arm two weeks a month. According to Somers, the bio-identical hormones are identical to the ones created by the human body, unlike conventional hormones, which are made from mare’s urine.

The result has been a media firestorm condemning both Somers and Oprah, including the hit piece in Newsweek linked below. The authors of the piece, Weston Kosova and Pat Wingert, argues that bio-identical hormones are just as synthetic as conventional hormones — although they don’t much discuss the fact that conventional hormones are actually different from the 17-beta-estradiol made by your body, while the bio-identical hormones are 17-beat-estradiol itself.

The real reason for the attacks on bio-identical hormones? As Somers points out, may doctors, scientists and media figures make a good deal of money off of the pharmaceutical industry. And one thing you won’t see mentioned in the Newsweek article is the fact that Pat Wingert is the co-author of a pharmaceutically biased book on hormones and menopause, and that  Newsweek is heavily funded by pharmaceutical companies.

Read More = Newsweek -  30 May 2009

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

WARNING: RealAge Sells Your Sensitive Information to Drug Companies

RealAge, a Web site which promises to help shave years off your age, has become one of the most popular tests on the Internet. More than 27 million people have taken the site’s test, which asks 150 or so questions about lifestyle and family history to assign a “biological age,” how young or old your habits make you. Then, RealAge makes recommendations on how to get “younger,” like taking multivitamins, eating breakfast and flossing your teeth.

But while RealAge purports to promote better living through nonmedical solutions, it makes its money by selling better living through drugs. RealAge acts as a clearinghouse for drug companies, including Pfizer, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline. The companies pay RealAge to compile test results of RealAge members and send them marketing messages by e-mail. The drug companies can even use RealAge answers to find people who show symptoms of a disease, and begin sending them messages about it even before the people have received a diagnosis from their doctors.

Read More =  New York Times March 25, 2009

, , , , ,

No Comments

Where in the world do people feel most content with their lives?

A new report reveals where people feel most positive about their lives.

According to a new report released by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), a Paris-based group of 30 countries with democratic governments that provides economic and social statistics and data, happiness levels are highest in northern European countries.

Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands rated at the top of the list, ranking first, second and third, respectively. Outside Europe, New Zealand and Canada landed at Nos. 8 and 6, respectively. The U.S. did not crack the top 10. Switzerland placed seventh and Belgium placed tenth.

Read More: Forbes.com 05.05.09

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Half a Glass of Wine a Day Could Boost Your Life Expectancy by Five Years

Long-term wine consumption is related to cardiovascular mortality and life expectancy independently of moderate alcohol intake

Drinking up to half a glass of wine a day may boost life expectancy by five years—at least in men—suggests research published ahead of print in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

The Dutch authors base their findings on a total of 1,373 randomly selected men whose cardiovascular health and life expectancy at age 50 were repeatedly monitored between 1960 and 2000.

The researchers looked into how much alcohol the men drank, what type it was, and over what period, in a bid to assess whether this had any impact on the risks of their dying from cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and from all causes.

They also tracked weight and diet, whether the men smoked, and for how long, and checked for the presence of serious illness.

During the 40 years of monitoring, 1,130 of the men died. Over half the deaths were caused by cardiovascular disease.

The proportion of men who drank alcohol almost doubled from 45% in 1960 to 86% in 2000, with the proportion of those drinking wine soaring from 2% to 44% during that period.

The researchers found that light long term alcohol consumption of all types—up to 20 g a day— extended life by around two extra years compared with no alcohol at all. Extended life expectancy was slightly less for those who drank more than 20 g.

And men who drank only wine, and less than half a glass of it a day, lived around 2.5 years longer than those who drank beer and spirits, and almost five years longer than those who drank no alcohol at all.

Drinking wine was strongly associated with a lower risk of dying from coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and death from all causes.

These results held true, irrespective of socioeconomic status, dietary and other lifestyle habits, factors long thought to influence the association between wine drinking and better health.

Source = Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health - April 30, 2009

, , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments

How toxic metals in food can impact children’s behavior

The contamination of food with certain metals needs to be urgently addressed in light of growing evidence linking trace elements to negative human behaviour, according to a lead researcher in the field.

Metals and other elements can be present in food either naturally, as a result of human activities (such as farming, industry or car exhausts), from contamination during manufacture/processing and storage, or by direct addition.

It has long been known that excessive amounts of any metal could be potentially dangerous, but there is now also strong evidence that some trace elements can contribute to aggressive or anti-social behaviour, said Neil Ward, professor of chemistry at the UK’s University of Surrey.

To read the rest of the story: NutraIngredients.com March 25, 2009

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

What is Your Metabolic Type? Take the Self Test.

This test is based on Dr. William Donald Kelley original approach to nutrition further extended by William Wolcott in his research. His book Metabolic Typing Diet is the basis of the metabolic typing self test.

This test takes approximately half an hour. Take your time and once you decided for an answer (A, B, or C), check the radio button corresponding to that answer for each of the sixty five questions. Some questions have only two or even one answer to chose from. If you changed your mind, for multiple choices, just check a different radio button or for single choice questions, if it doesn’t apply, you may double click that button to uncheck it. And, yes, if some questions are not relevant to you, just skip them. More questions you answer though, more relevant the final answer is for your metabolic type. That’s it! See you at the finish line.

Go to Better Mind to take the test.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

America’s Worst Lunches - And What You Should Eat Instead

If you’re like two-thirds of working Americans, you pick up lunch from a fast-food joint or restaurant at least once a week. Sure, it’s not as healthy as packing your own celery sticks, but eating out every once in a while can’t hurt, right?

Not so fast: There might be trouble in the drive-through lane.

Not only could the window worker pile an entire day’s worth of calories through your car window, but you might also be sapping your energy and productivity: Carb overloads lead to energy spikes and crashes, and studies have shown that the bigger your waistline, the lower your cognitive functioning and the more sick days you take. Kind of ironic, considering “convenience” is the most common reason people give for buying lunch during the workday. In this economy, it’s hardly convenient to snore through the 2 o’clock meeting, or miss a few crucial days when the boss is looking for you.

A healthy lunch can help you maximize your afternoon performance, but if you’re in a hurry to grab and go, you might not take the time to sort through the menu hits and misses. Let the Eat This, Not That! folks be your efficiency experts: DON’T order the items we warn you about, below. Opt instead for less outrageous alternatives (also below), and reap the benefits at bonus time.

QUIZNO’S

Large Prime Rib Cheesesteak Sub

  • 1,490 calories
  • 92 g fat (22.5 g saturated, 2 g trans)
  • 2,620 mg sodium

Fat equivalent: Like eating four Dunkin Donuts cheese danishes!

It’s hard enough to make the argument for one cheese Danish, but four? And we’re just talking fat, here—with more than 800 calories of the stuff in just one sandwich. You’re also be filling up with more than a day’s worth of sodium and saturated fat. While this is one of the worst items you could choose, the rest of the Quizno’s menu has hazards, as well. But if your co-workers insist on eating there, order this instead:

Small Turkey Ranch and Swiss Sub

  • 410 calories
  • 17 g fat (2.5 g saturated)
  • 1,230 mg sodium

CHILI’S

  • Crispy Sweet Chile Glazed Chicken Crispers
  • 1,930 calories
  • 112 g fat (17 g saturated)
  • 4,190 mg sodium

Calorie equivalent: Like eating an entire medium Pizza Hut 12″ pepperoni pizza!

If you have the time for a sit-down meal, you have the time to think this through. Chicken Crispers are fun, but account for almost a whole day’s worth of calories and almost two days’ worth of sodium. Your smarter choice is to eat this instead:

Classic Chicken Fajitas

  • 370 calories
  • 11 g fat (1.5 saturated)
  • 2,000 mg sodium

And another hint for a healthy sit-down lunch: forgo the appetizers. Chili’s Texas Cheese Fries with Jalapeno Ranch Dressing made the top of our list when we rounded up the worst appetizers money can buy. Check out the other appetizer land-mines here. You’ll be shocked.

ARBY’S

Roast Turkey Ranch and Bacon Sandwich

  • 817 calories
  • 37 g fat (11 g saturated, 0.5 g trans)
  • 2,146 mg sodium

Calorie equivalent: Like eating 23 Thin Mints (one whole sleeve)!

Just because you could prepare it at home doesn’t mean it’s good for you when you order it away from home—the Roast Turkey Ranch and Bacon Sandwich packs nearly half of your daily allowance of calories and almost an entire day’s dose of sodium. Doesn’t leave much room for anything else, does it?

Eat this instead:

Sourdough Roast Beef Melt

  • 351 calories
  • 14 g fat (4 g saturated)
  • 1,048 mg of sodium

DAIRY QUEEN

Chicken Strip Basket with Country Gravy (6 piece)

  • 1,640 calories
  • 74 g fat (12 g saturated, 1 g trans)
  • 3,690 mg sodium

Sodium equivalent: Like eating 11 large orders of McDonald’s French fries!

Talk about a value meal: One Chicken Strip Basket gives you almost two days’ payload of sodium! If thinking about it doesn’t elevate your blood pressure, eating it might. Don’t become a statistic.

Eat this instead:

Crispy Chicken Sandwich

  • 560 calories
  • 28 g fat (3.5 g saturated)
  • 980 mg sodium

To Read the Rest of The Story = MSN Health & Fitness

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Sleep May Help Clear Brain For New Learning

A new theory about sleep’s benefits for the brain gets a boost from fruit flies in the journal Science. Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found evidence that sleep, already recognized as a promoter of long-term memories, also helps clear room in the brain for new learning.

The critical question: How many synapses, or junctures where nerve cells communicate with each other, are modified by sleep? Neurologists believe creation of new synapses is one key way the brain encodes memories and learning, but this cannot continue unabated and may be where sleep comes in.

“There are a number of reasons why the brain can’t indefinitely add synapses, including the finite spatial constraints of the skull,” says senior author Paul Shaw, Ph.D., assistant professor of neurobiology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “We were able to track the creation of new synapses in fruit flies during learning experiences, and to show that sleep pushed that number back down.”

Scientists don’t yet know how the synapses are eliminated. According to theory, only the less important connections are trimmed back, while connections encoding important memories are maintained.

To Read More Check Out: Science Daily April 3, 2009

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments